Insights
  • AT&T

14.1% of Lapsed Cricket Wireless Customers Returned vs. 11.5% of Metro Lapsers

Among 2,111 lapsed Cricket Wireless customers, 14.1% returned within eight months, 13.5% paid a visible rival, and 72.4% had no visible carrier payment.

Cricket Wireless lapsers returned more often than Metro lapsers

Mutually exclusive January–August 2026 outcomes after established customers had no Cricket Wireless or Metro bills in July–December 2025

Source: YipitData U.S. debit/credit card panel. Cricket Wireless lapsers n=2,111; Metro lapsers n=2,231. Cash, retail-card, and off-panel carrier payments are not visible.

Chart data

Cricket Wireless lapsers returned more often than Metro lapsers
SeriesShare of lapsed customers
Cricket — returned14.1%
Metro — returned11.5%
Cricket — visible rival13.5%
Metro — visible rival13.2%
Cricket — no visible carrier72.4%
Metro — no visible carrier75.3%

How did visible competitive movement compare between Cricket Wireless and Metro?

The visible-rival rates were nearly identical: 13.5% of Cricket Wireless lapsers and 13.2% of Metro lapsers paid a tracked competitor. Cricket’s 2.6-point advantage appeared in return payments to the original carrier, not in a lower observed competitor rate.

Does no visible carrier payment mean the customer left wireless service?

No. Prepaid service is often funded with cash, retail refill cards, or a card outside the panel, while family and postpaid plans may be paid by another household member. The 72.4% and 75.3% shares are measurement states, not proof that customers stopped using wireless service.

How was a lapsed customer defined?

Customers first needed at least three monthly recurring bills from January–June 2025, then no bill from their original carrier—Cricket Wireless or Metro—from July–December 2025. Return and rival outcomes were observed strictly afterward, from January–August 2026, so the measured payments follow the lapse window.

Assumptions & Methodologies

We used YipitData’s U.S. debit/credit card panel through August 15, 2026. Established Cricket Wireless and Metro customers had at least three recurring bills in January–June 2025; lapsers had none in July–December 2025. Outcomes in January–August 2026 were mutually exclusive: returned to their original carrier, paid one of 11 tracked rivals, or had no visible carrier payment. Device purchases were excluded. Cash, retail refill, off-panel cards, family plans, and an indistinct AT&T prepaid merchant limit visibility, so missing payments do not prove category exit.

Keep exploring

Ask a follow-up question

Take this research one step further with YipitData.

How long did returned Cricket Wireless customers remain active after reappearing?

Which visible competitors gained the most Cricket Wireless lapsers?

How did return rates differ by prior Cricket Wireless tenure?

Data sources

Credit & Debit PanelTransaction-level spending across the US economy