InvestingPro appeared first more often, but its last receipt also came first more often
First- and last-observed receipt order among 61 InvestingPro and TradingView dual subscribers, 2023–August 2026
Dual subscribers
Source: YipitData U.S. e-receipt panel. Sixteen subscribers started both in the same period, and 15 were still observed together. Annual billing makes receipt-order results directional.
Chart data
| Series | Dual subscribers |
|---|---|
| InvestingPro started first | 33 subscribers |
| TradingView started first | 12 subscribers |
| Earlier InvestingPro last receipt | 28 subscribers |
| Earlier TradingView last receipt | 18 subscribers |
How often did InvestingPro subscribers also pay for TradingView?
TradingView appeared among 16.2% of 377 InvestingPro subscribers, while InvestingPro appeared among 2.3% of 2,653 TradingView subscribers. Across eight measured research and charting products, InvestingPro also had the highest share paying another tool, at 26.8%.
Did InvestingPro usually start after TradingView?
No. After 16 same-period starts, 45 subscribers had a clear start order: InvestingPro had the earlier first receipt for 33 and TradingView for 12. After 15 subscribers were still observed together, 46 had a decided last-receipt order: InvestingPro had the earlier last receipt for 28 and TradingView for 18.
Does an earlier last receipt prove that a subscriber canceled InvestingPro first?
No. Annual billing and missing receipt channels can create long gaps. InvestingPro had the earlier last observed receipt more often in this small dual-subscriber group, but that does not establish a confirmed cancellation decision or a causal shift toward TradingView.
Assumptions & Methodologies
We analyzed YipitData’s U.S. e-receipt panel from 2023 through August 2026. InvestingPro and competing research tools were identified from subscription line-item text across direct and intermediary billing. The wallet comparison included 377 InvestingPro subscribers, 2,653 TradingView subscribers, and 61 who paid both. Start order used first observed receipts; last-receipt order required at least a 60-day gap. Annual plans and unobserved billing channels can distort both dates, and the dual-subscriber group is small. Results are directional and describe receipt order, not confirmed cancellation, product use, substitution, or causation.