Insights
  • Grab

39.1% of New Stash Adopters Already Had Another Investing Relationship

Among 635 new Stash adopters from Jan. 2025–Jun. 2026, 39.1% had another investing relationship vs. 14.0% of panelists with 50+ receipts a year.

New Stash adopters were more likely to have another investing relationship

Share with a tracked investing relationship in the 12 months before Stash adoption

Source: YipitData U.S. e-receipt panel. New Stash adopters n=635; the comparison group included panelists with at least 50 receipts per year. It controls for receipt activity, not every customer difference.

Chart data

New Stash adopters were more likely to have another investing relationship
SeriesShare with a prior investing relationship
New Stash adopters39.1%
Panelists with 50+ receipts per year14%

How recently had these Stash adopters used another investing service?

Among the 248 adopters with a prior investing relationship, 61.7% had a competitor receipt within 60 days before joining Stash and 66.5% had one within 90 days. Only 15.3% had last appeared 181–365 days earlier. The typical relationship was therefore recent rather than long dormant.

How often were new Stash adopters using multiple brokerages?

Among adopters with a prior investing relationship, 37.1% had used at least two tracked brokerages during the prior year. Robinhood was the most common individual relationship, appearing for 14.7% of all new Stash adopters versus 4.9% of panelists with at least 50 receipts per year, a roughly threefold difference.

Does this show that Stash replaced another investing app?

No. The analysis measures activity before Stash adoption and does not test whether competitor use declined afterward. It shows that many adopters added Stash while another investing relationship was still active, not which service later became their primary account.

Assumptions & Methodologies

We identified 635 U.S. e-receipt panelists whose first observed Stash bank-linking confirmation occurred from January 2025–June 2026 and who had a full prior year of observation. A prior relationship required a receipt from Robinhood, Coinbase, SoFi, Charles Schwab, Webull, E*Trade, Wealthfront, or Public in the preceding 12 months. The comparison group required at least 50 receipts per year. The onboarding template appeared intermittently, so results combine new adopters across January 2025–June 2026 rather than showing a trend. Uneven brokerage capture makes prior-investing shares floors; no post-adoption switching or causality is measured.

Keep exploring

Ask a follow-up question

Take this research one step further with YipitData.

Did prior investors retain Stash differently from adopters with no observed investing relationship?

How did competitor activity change after customers joined Stash?

Which prior brokerage relationships most often remained active after Stash adoption?

Data sources

Email Receipt PanelDigital purchases and subscription behavior