Insights
  • The New York Times Company

Separately Billed The Athletic Subscribers Paid for Live Sports at Twice the New York Times All Access Bundle-Only Rate

Among 961 separately billed The Athletic subscribers, 50.2% paid for live-sports streaming vs. 23.8% of 3,851 New York Times All Access bundle-only subscribers.

Insight 1 of 2

Separately billed The Athletic subscribers held live-sports streaming at twice the bundle-only rate

Share with at least one external live-sports streaming receipt, August 17, 2025–August 17, 2026

Source: YipitData U.S. e-receipt panel. Separately billed The Athletic subscribers n=961; New York Times bundle-only subscribers receiving The Athletic n=3,851. Subscribers with both were assigned to the separately billed cohort.

Chart data

Separately billed The Athletic subscribers held live-sports streaming at twice the bundle-only rate
SeriesShare with live-sports streaming
Separately billed The Athletic subscribers50.2%
New York Times bundle-only subscribers23.8%

Which live-sports services had the widest gaps?

ESPN overlap was 34.6% among separately billed The Athletic subscribers versus 15.6% among bundle-only subscribers. NFL+ or Sunday Ticket reached 11.8% versus 4.1%, NBA League Pass reached 8.0% versus 2.0%, and MLB.TV reached 7.8% versus 2.0%.

Insight 2 of 2

Netflix overlap was nearly identical across The Athletic cohorts

Share with a Netflix receipt, August 17, 2025–August 17, 2026

Source: YipitData U.S. e-receipt panel. Separately billed The Athletic subscribers n=961; New York Times bundle-only subscribers receiving The Athletic n=3,851. Netflix provides a general-entertainment comparison.

Chart data

Netflix overlap was nearly identical across The Athletic cohorts
SeriesShare with Netflix
Separately billed The Athletic subscribers39.8%
New York Times bundle-only subscribers39.5%

Was the live-sports difference just broader streaming activity?

The Netflix rates were effectively the same at 39.8% and 39.5%. Overlap with any general-entertainment streamer was closer as well, at 75.2% for separately billed subscribers and 68.1% for bundle-only subscribers. The much larger live-sports gap was therefore not mirrored in the general-entertainment comparison.

Assumptions & Methodologies

We analyzed our U.S. e-receipt panel from August 17, 2025–August 17, 2026. Separately billed The Athletic subscribers had an Apple, Google, or New York Times-billed Athletic receipt; bundle-only subscribers had a New York Times All Access line naming The Athletic but no separate Athletic receipt. The cohorts had 961 and 3,851 panelists observed throughout. Overlap required at least one external-service receipt. The static, self-selected cohorts do not establish sequence or causality. Anyone with a separate The Athletic receipt was classified as separately billed, even if they also had the New York Times bundle, so measured bundle-only overlap may be understated.

Keep exploring

Ask a follow-up question

Take this research one step further with YipitData.

Which live-sports subscriptions most often preceded a separately billed The Athletic subscription?

Did separately billed The Athletic subscribers retain differently when they also paid for a league pass?

How did sports-streaming overlap vary across New York Times bundle tenures and plans?

Data sources

Email Receipt PanelDigital purchases and subscription behavior